Login
My Account
Home Join RegisterRegister
Does Porn Need Storylines?
By Liselle

It's a frosty Saturday night in London, so I've decided to have a cosy, quiet and naughty evening in.

Provisions required: a decent glass of red, no disruptions (mobile is off) and 1, or even 2 raunchy films of my choice.

contentheaderalt


OK, my choice... This is the tricky bit.

Option A - Elaborate Epics:
Porn disguised as genre flicks. E.g. a 'no-pants period drama'. Ideal porn for couples, as guys can watch it with their girlfriends because 'it ain't really porn, luv. Honest.'

Option B - Girl-friendly Porn (whatever the hell that means - more on this in later blogs):
For now, this illusive term means films with higher production values, stylish settings, some characterisation and hotter-than-average (male) 'talent'. Hurrah!
In reality, it can sometimes mean a couple of semi-naked ladies caressing each other with feathers, while the only man in the room is wasted on blowing into a saxophone. Beware of the latter, unless you don't actually like sex (or really like jazz).

Option C - Four-letter-keyword Quickies:
Bespoke and to the point. Sometimes this hits the spot because it does exactly what it says on the filthy little tin. Plus, occasionally we just want to skip straight to the messy stuff.



contentheaderalt


And so it begins...

Rifling through the Option As, I seem drawn to the titles that make me laugh. Focus, Liselle! You wanted to be turned on, not cheered up.

Perhaps the comedy storyline appeases some porn-guilt I never realised I had.
I guess a good, cheesy spoof can make anything seem less offensive - even bad scriptwriting and exposed genitals. Laughter makes the conscience lighter, perhaps?

Despite this, I'm not in the mood for humour. So, onto something more serious: Option B. Now the "quality" stuff is tempting, as I'm partial to charm and context... and there is value in professional lighting. BUT will all the glamour, gloss and storyline prevent me from relating to the sex? It could simply be a beautiful waste of time and quite literally, an anti-climax.

Which brings me to the no frills, no shame, Option C. If it's porn I want, then maybe I should just get stuck in there with my dirty keywords and be done with it.

contentheaderalt


But is that really all I want? What about sexual tension, seduction, fantasy, or even just a bit of foreplay? Surely, I need porn with a storyline!

At this point, I realise that instead of having my naughty night in, I have, in fact, conducted valuable porn research and self-analysis. Impressive. However, I've also finished the wine and can now hear the cat squeaking at me from the living room.

So, re-focussing, I write this blog and email my friends to find out their thoughts on the matter.

Below are some of the good and bad things about storylines in porn.



The Good: Storylines can...


1. Cater for both her and him

2. Add a sense of reality, empathy, and fantasy

3. Act as 'foreplay', raising our expectation and teasing us

4. Build tension and chemistry between the performers

5. Ease us in to a hardcore scene, or get us in the mood

6. Be used as a mechanism to move the action on, change location, or introduce new characters

7. Add variety to our porn collections



The Bad: Storylines can...


1. Waste time when you just want to get to the action

2. Add comedy, which can be a big turn-off

3. Be limited by the performers' (lack of) talent

4. Distract us from the sex

5. Cause us practical problems (fast-forwarding is tricky when your hands are busy)

6. Build up too much sexual expectation and cause an anti-climax

7. Allow directors to sometimes neglect the actual sex in favour of elaborate plot, set and dialogue


So all you lovely readers out there, what do you think?

TELL US HOW IT REALLY IS!



Posted comments

Logon to post a comment
Please login to post a comment
If you don't have an account create one now. Register
rabb1trabb1t
2010-02-11 23:50:04 Not rated
I find porn with lame story lines to be a turn-off. As a male, the visuals certainly do it for me, but my arousal is often undermined by the insult of having my entire sexuality reduced to an 'on-off' button. If the biggest sex organ is the brain, failing to cater to what the brain needs is such a missed opportunity.

Where is the thrill of the chase? The anticipation? The seduction? My life isn't a series of 'hello, bang!' encounters, and so I find it hard to imagine myself in the role.

I can watch a hard core sex scene and not be turned on at all, while I can also watch a seduction scene with very little exposed skin and be very turned on.

I recently discussed this with my wife and drew a map of my sexuality.
Emotional/Relational, Spiritual, Safety, Visual, Fantasy, Intellect, Ego.

Porn often caters to visual, ego and in doing so, undermines fantasy with leaving nothing to the imagination, intellect by having story lines that are not credible or engaging, cheesy puns in titles, overly explicit graphics on covers, and largely completely misses emotional/relational and spiritual dynamics.

Paul, Australia
johnwalter90019
2009-07-11 19:39:34 Not rated
Sometimes a very sexy mainstream movie is more arousing because the actresses are so talented at portraying sexual arousal. I\'m thinking of Mary Louise Parker of Weeds and others. I wonder who else people think are talented at this particular niche of acting.
otorrenspaul
2009-01-18 07:54:14 Not rated
Nice blog, Liselle, and a well argued analysis that I, as a man, partially agree with. Plots can occasionally be good, particularly if you're watching your seedy flick with a partner. But it's rare to see good actors in these filthy roles, so this, coupled with a hackneyed storyline usually does more harm than good. And, speaking personally, if I were watching something alone, I'd want something that went straight to the money shot. By the way, hard fu? Is that a martial art? (Sorry, rubbish joke.)

Paul
WebEncript - This site is verified as secure daily by encription limited ethical hacking services